
| |
|
Volume 43, Number 8
August 31, 2007 |
If
this e-mail does not display correctly, click here to view a printer-friendly version in your web browser.
Editorial
| |
The Leading Edge of Progress |
|
| |
|
|
| ... |
Most people would probably agree with the adage that necessity is the mother of invention.
These words are as relevant today as they were when first written in Plato's Republic more than 2,300 years ago.
So if necessity drives invention, what then, leads inventors to try, sometimes fail, and then try again until an invention is delivered successfully? ...
In our view, the answer is not buried in ancient philosophy. No, it's really very simple. |
... |
| |
It is simply that voice inside that says, "I can build it better." We think that voice is what leads engineers to engineering; roadbuilders to placing concrete pavements; and others to meet the changing needs of people all around us. It is what leads inventors to invent.
That spirit exists in the concrete pavement industry, and indeed, in the broad transportation- construction community.
And so it is that we devote this issue of CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROGRESS to the pioneering spirit of those who came before us as well as those current and future inventors whose attitudes about building it better are putting this industry on the cutting edge of progress.
This is not a be-all, end-all story, but simply a current snapshot of those emerging technologies that hold tremendous promise for enhancing the safety, efficiency, and overall performance of concrete pavements. As these technologies continue to emerge, the road-users benefit from wiser investments in better highways, roadways, and airfields. The agencies benefit in much the same way, but also benefit because their jobs will be easier, too. The industry, of course, benefits from the efficiencies and process improvements.
We think this is an exciting and interesting time to be a part of the transportation community, particularly as the story continues to unfurl and emerging technologies—those things just showing up on the proverbial radar screen today—become the best practices of tomorrow.
What is or will be your role in this sea-change of emerging technologies that will impact the transportation-construction community. Whether you're a pioneer or a relative newcomer, we'd like to hear from you.
Drop us a line at acpa@pavement.com to let us know your views about the leading edge of progress!
|
|
Return to Top
| |
Advancing a New Standard in Concrete Pavement Mixes
|
|
| |
|
|
| ... |
As the demand increases for better performing, longer-lasting, and maintenance-free highway infrastructures, it becomes increasingly important that concrete pavements are readily constructible, and capable of meeting structural and ride requirements. Moreover, they have to do so for the specified amounts of traffic loadings and expected design life.
Although much has been published about how to design and proportion general-use concrete mixtures properly, very little has been focused solely on concrete paving mixtures. This is important because there are unique demands placed on a concrete pavement mixture, including its placement requirements; high temperature and moisture variations; high surface-area-to-volume ratio; wide range of loadings; and varying degrees of underlying support.
Why This? Why Now?
A number of factors underscore the critical need for a uniform concrete pavement mix design.
Shift of Responsibility … The roadbuilding community is trending away from strictly prescriptive specifications toward more advanced acceptance tools, such as end-result and performance specifications. This will make contractors more responsible for concrete pavement mixture design and proportioning.
Loss of Expertise … In the U.S., the majority of the concrete pavements that we drive on today were designed and proportioned by engineers that gained their experience during the construction of the vast interstate and US trunk highway system. In both the public and private sectors, much of this expertise has been lost through retirement or attrition in the workforce.
Increased Demands on Concrete Mixtures… For much of the 20th century, the same materials—portland cement, high quality aggregates, and water—were used in pavement concrete, with only minor refinements.
The concrete mixtures used were fairly forgiving and allowed for significant variations, but in the last decade or so, new generations of mixtures—containing fly ash, slag, and recycled aggregates--can result in incompatibilities and reduced mixture uniformity.
Existing Guidance is Inadequate ... There are a number of resources |
... |
| |
|
|
| |
Mixture Design or
Mixture Proportioning? |
|
| |
|
|
| ... |
To minimize confusion and establish consistent terminology industry-wide it is important to clarify the difference between mixture design and mixture proportioning.
The terms “mixture design” (mix design) and “mixture proportioning” are often incorrectly used interchangeably (US DOT 2006).
Mixture design is the process by which the concrete mixture performance characteristics are defined. It is in the mixture design process that you establish parameters such as air content, workability and required strength. These parameters are driven by factors such as the pavement’s service environment, construction method and structural requirement.
Once the mixture design parameters are established; materials characteristics have been determined ; and production technology has been identified, the concrete mixture proportions can be developed using relationships that have been established either through research or by experience.
(Source: Hover, K., Portland Cement Concrete Mixture Design and Proportioning – Instructor’s Course. Presented in Ames, Iowa, January 2001.)
|
... |
| |
|
|
|
available to help properly design and proportion concrete mixtures, including American Concrete Institute's publication 211.1-91: Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight and Mass Concrete, and PCA EB001.14: Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures. However, the majority of this guidance is fairly generic, and applies to a whole host of concrete applications, from structural columns and girders to mass foundations and sidewalks.
ACPA recently participated with the National Concrete Pavement Technology Center on a comprehensive state-of-the-practice manual that discusses both materials and construction practices for concrete pavement. Even though this manual provides a vast amount of immensely valuable information pertaining to pavement design, concrete materials, cement hydration, pavement construction, quality control, testing and troubleshooting, it does not elaborate on practical concrete paving mixture proportioning strategies to provide the reader with easy-to-implement guidance – the mixture proportioning guidance is essentially identical to that presented in ACI 211.1.
Recognizing the lack of guidance related specifically for concrete pavement mixtures, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the concrete pavement industry have dedicated the first track of the comprehensive and collaborative Concrete Pavement Road Map (CP Road Map) to this purpose.
|
... |
| |
 |
... |
Significant Advances
A preliminary implementation plan for this “Performance-Based Concrete Pavement Mix Design System” has taken shape recently. The first task in this plan is to develop an easy-to-use and reliable method—in the form of a guide-book—to design and proportion robust concrete paving mixtures. Industry has taken on the challenge of leading the development of this guide, and anticipates completion within three years. Although the effort is industry-led, the guide will be developed through a true collaborative effort with involvement from FHWA, |
|
| |
A collaborative effort by the public sector, industry, and academia is expected to yield a comprehensive guide to designing and controlling concrete mixtures for pavement applications. |
|
State agencies, the consulting community as well as academia.
The guide, whose working title is “Design and Proportioning of Concrete |
|
| |
Paving Mixtures” will complement PCA’s perennially popular publication, “Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures” (PCA EB001).
Other Important Steps
As identified in the Implementation Plan for Performance-Based Mixture Design and Analysis Track (NCPTC 2007), there are several other tasks included in the MDA track, including:
- Mixture Testing and Analysis Manual—This project consists of developing a manual with two discrete elements. The first part of the manual will identify and describe all relevant concrete design properties/characteristics than an owner may require as part of a concrete pavement specification, as well as the accompanying test procedures to measure those properties. The second part of the manual will focus on procedures for analyzing concrete pavement mixtures in specific applications and predicting their performance under anticipated placement conditions. Several tools are already available that can aid in this effort, including the Mechanistic-Empirical Design Guide (NCHRP 1-37a), HIPERPAV, and COMPASS. State agencies will take the lead in this effort.
- Evaluation of Emerging Laboratory Testing and Equipment—This task focuses on evaluating two important tests currently under development: the calorimetry heat signature test and coefficient of thermal expansion test. It is anticipated that both of these tests will be included among the tests considered in the Mixture Testing and Analysis Manual above, and that the test protocols ultimately be considered for adoption by American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). State agencies will lead efforts under this task.
- Modeling and Software Assessment—State of Practice and Future Advancement. This project calls for an assessment of available software tools and models, with recommendations for improvements and options for integration. The ultimate goal is to establish the framework for a fully integrated software package that is reliable, flexible, easy to use, and minimizes the required inputs. FHWA will lead this effort.
- Field Evaluation, Coordination, Training and Outreach—This task provides for field evaluations of the mixture tools developed in previous tasks, and will generate specifications and practices. A series of technology transfer activities will also be included in this task. At this writing, no specific task leader has yet been identified for this project.
In November, ACPA will present a paper at the International Conference on Optimizing Paving Concrete Mixtures and Accelerated Concrete Pavement Construction & Rehabilitation. For more information on ACPA's paper, contact Leif Wathne at 202-638-2272. For more information on the conference, click here or contact Shiraz Tayabji at 410-997-0400.
For more information about this article, contact Leif Wathne at 202-638-2272.
| ... |
References for the paper on which this article was based include:
- American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA), Concrete Pavement Field Reference; Pre-Paving. EB237P, Skokie, Illinois, 2007.
- Hover, K., Portland Cement Concrete Mixture Design and Proportioning – Instructor’s Course. Presented in Ames, Iowa, January 2001.
- Kosmatka, S.H., B, Kerkhoff, and W.C. Panarese, Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, Portland Cement Association, EB001.14, Skokie Illinois, 2002.
- National Concrete Pavement Technology Center (NCPTC). Implementation Plan for Performance-Based Mixture Design and Analysis Track. Presented to MCC in Dayton OH, March 2007.
- Shilstone, J.M. Sr., Concrete Mixture Optimization. Concrete International, 12.6. Farmington Hills, Michigan, 1990.
- Simon, M.J., E.S. Lagergren, and L.G. Wathne, Optimizing High-Performance Concrete Mixtures Using Statistical Response Surface Methods, Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Utilization of High-Strength/High-Performance Concrete, Sandefjord, Norway, June 1999.
- Thomas, C., The Future of Your Discipline – Civil Job Hunting. www.GraduatingEngineer.com, 2007.
U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Highway Administration. The Concrete Pavement Roadmap – An Executive Summary. HRT-05-047, Washington DC, 2005.
- U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Highway Administration. Integrated Materials and Construction Practices for Concrete Pavement: A State-of-the-Practice Manual. HIF-07-004, Washington DC, 2006.
|
... |
|
|
Return to Top
| |
Investigating Two-Lift Concrete Pavements |
|
| |
|
|
| ... |
Transportation-construction stakeholders are currently investigating two-lift construction for use in certain applications.
This technology, which may help address issues with aggregate quality, was identified as a top priority for review during the recent international scan tour of long-life concrete pavements.
Based on the interest in two-lift construction, ACPA members and staff identified the technology as one that needed further investigation. |
... |
 |
... |
| |
At the ACPA mid-year meetings, the Innovative Ideas Committee, resolved to conduct further analysis and report its findings at
|
|
Two-lift construction of concrete pavements is being evaluated on a limited basis for potential applications in the United States. |
|
| |
the upcoming ACPA Annual Meeting in November.
In its report, "Reassessing Two-Lift Construction," the National Concrete Pavement Technology Center (CP Tech Center) notes that cost, mix design, and construction concerns inhibited its use.
Since the report was published in 2004, though, there's been a resurgence of interest in the technology, owing in some part to the International Scanning Tour for Long Life Pavements, in which ACPA, CP Tech Center, the Federal Highway Administration, other stakeholders had the opportunity to see first-hand how the technology is used in Europe.
What is two-lift paving?
Two-lift construction involves the placement of two wet-on-wet layers or bonding wet to dry layers of concrete, instead of the homogenous single layer commonly placed in concrete paving, according to the CP Tech Center.
The bottom layer is thick and consists of lower quality (lower durability or strength), locally available aggregate or recycled aggregate (such as recycled asphalt, concrete rubble, or local aggregate). The top layer is thin and consists of high-quality aggregate designed to provide better resistance to freeze-thaw damage, reduced noise, or improved friction. The high-quality surface also increases friction and reduces noise, according to the tech transfer summary.
As quality aggregate becomes scarce in some regions, two-lift paving may become a more viable economic
option. It may help some agencies around the country consume growing recycled asphalt stockpiles, which could reduce overall costs while benefiting the environment, according to the CP Tech Center.
Existing composite pavements (concrete pavements with asphalt overlays) can be successfully recycled by first separating the asphalt overlay and then using 15% to 40% asphalt in the final lower lift of concrete, according to the CP Tech Center's report.
For its part, ACPA has not adopted a formal position on two-lift construction, but is currently evaluating this emerging technology. Look for more information in future issues of CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROGRESS.
Click here to download the report from the long-life concrete pavement scan tour, which includes an assessment of two-lift construction.
Click here for the complete tech transfer summary on two-lift construction from the CP Tech Center. |
|
Return to Top
| |
Nanotechnology Investigated for
Pavement Performance |
|
| |
|
|
| ... |
The cement and concrete pavement industries are currently investigating nanotechnology and its potential to affect performance in some surprising ways.
Nanotechnology may improve transportation infrastructure with materials and designs that last longer, as well as its potential for long-term monitoring techniques of degradation and safety hazards, according to Bjorn Birgisson, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Civil & Coastal Engineering, University of Florida. The comments appear in the report, Nanotechnology in Concrete-Based Materials. Nano Defined
To understand how nanotechnology can play a role in cement and concrete industries, it’s |
... |
| |
|
| |
important to have a macro view of this microtechnology, according to Birgisson.
First, a nano is 10 to the negative 9th power, read as 0.000,000,001, which means really, really small, at the molecular level. By altering cement and concrete pavement at this level, nanotechnology holds promise for improved performance and changes of fundamental properties.
On the manufacturing side, it’s widely believed that nanotechnology holds the key to reducing CO2 emissions in cement production, said Gerald F. Voigt, P.E., ACPA's President and CEO.
"On the product side, it’s not only feasible, but practical to focus on reverse-engineering concrete pavements to produce a pavement that has the compressive strength of traditional concrete pavements, but the modulus of elasticity, and ductility of flexible pavements,"
Voigt told ON THE GRADE.
What Now?
With these promising possibilities identified, the transportation and concrete pavement industries are now working on how best to implement nanotechnology.
At the national level, the Federal Highway Agency (FHWA) is working with the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), a federal research and development program established to coordinate multi-agency efforts in national science, engineering, and technology. NNI has allocated about $1 billion dollars in research funding to transportation for 2007, according to Birgisson. FHWA’s Advanced Infrastructure Research program is spearheading these efforts to identify how to implement nanotechnology into everyday practice, according to CONCRETE PRODUCTS.
Elsewhere in the world, the European Union is spending 2.93 billion Euros (or about $3.7 billion) this year on nanotechnology, the article says.
Leaders estimate that it holds the following potential positive effects on the industry, according to CONCRETE PRODUCTS:
• Easing concrete distresses, such as alkali-silica reactivity (ASR) and delayed ettringite formation.
• Fundamental research into the interactions between fly ash and the nanostructure of portland cement gel is underway, using neutron scattering technology.
• Nanotechnology is providing a close-up look at the hydration of cement grains and the nanostructure of cement reactivity as hydrated surfaces develop on individual cement grains.
• The feasibility of Cyberliths, or Smart Aggregates, as wireless sensors embedded in concrete or soil is under examination.
ACPA has been working with public sector personnel, as well as other industry representatives and academia, to identify possible steps for implementing nanotechnology in the short term (three to five years) and long term (over the next decade). Spearheaded by a recent meeting with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the agency, along with the National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, National Ready Mixed Concrete Association, and Portland Cement Association, are exploring the technology.
J. Richard Capka, FHWA's Administrator, has also reinforced the need to implement nanotechnology across other agencies, including the Federal Aviation Administration and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
"We’re pleased and excited to be part of this large-scale research effort and are committed to working closely with other partners to advance nanotechnology research into the cement and concrete pavement industries," Voigt said.
For more information, contact Gerald F. Voigt at 847-966-2272. |
|
Return to Top
| |
Roller Compacted Concrete Can Offer
High Performance, Lower Costs |
|
| |
|
|
| |
by Wouter Gulden, P.E.
Director of Engineering & Training, ACPA—Southeast Chapter
|
|
| |
|
|
| ... |
Roller compacted concrete (RCC) is finding its way into a growing number of applications because it has been proven as a high-performance, low-cost option.
While not viable for all major highway applications, RCC is being used for certain pavement placements because it offers the long-life of concrete pavement at a price competitive with asphalt.
What is RCC?
RCC is a stiff zero-slump concrete that uses the same ingredients as conventional concrete but is placed with asphalt lay-down |
... |
 |
... |
| |
equipment and compacted by vibratory and static rollers to achieve a specified density. There are no dowels, reinforcing steel, |
|
Roller compacted concrete is placed with asphalt lay-down equipment but offers the cost efficiency, easy constructability, and durability of concrete pavement. |
|
| |
or air-entrainment, and there is no finishing of the surface.
Like conventional concrete, the materials used to produce RCC are cement, fly-ash, water, and both coarse and fine aggregates.
Where RCC differs is in its mix proportions. RCC typically has a water/cement ratio of 0.35 to 0.40 and sand from 40% to 50% of the aggregate volume. The higher fine aggregate content is necessary to produce the stability to support the rolling equipment. The cementitious content ranges from 400 to 550 lbs per cy.
RCC has 28 day strengths similar to conventional concrete ranging from 4,000 psi to 6,000 psi or higher depending upon the mix design and typically reach around 3,000 psi or more after 48 hours.
Mix proportioning for RCC must produce a material that is dry enough to support the weight of a vibratory roller, yet produce enough paste during consolidation to fill the voids in the aggregate structure and result in a strong concrete pavement. Curing is important since there is no bleed water, nor any excess water to lose after placement. Either moist cure or a good application of a curing compound have been found to be adequate immediately after placement.
How is it being used?
RCC was first used for a runway in 1942 in Washington. The rebirth in use of RCC got its start in the mid-1970s with logging yards in Canada.
Since that time, RCC has been used for tank pads at military bases, waste storage yards, industrial access roads, port container facilities, and residential streets throughout the country.
These days, it is increasingly used for parking areas for industrial plants, especially newly built automobile plants. For example, RCC has been the pavement of choice for new Honda, Mercedes-Benz, and Hyundai plants in Alabama since the late 1980's.
A new use for RCC is for shoulders along U.S. Interstates and major state highways with concrete pavements in lieu of asphalt. In 2005, the Georgia DOT replaced 34 lane miles of deteriorated asphalt shoulders along its beltway with more durable RCC shoulders. With traffic volumes exceeding 200,000 vehicles per day, comprised of 15 to 20% trucks, the construction was done on weekends to minimize disruption to the public. The cost is competitive with asphalt and offers the life-cycle cost of concrete.
The application of RCC pavements has expanded since its humble beginnings as a durable and heavy duty surface for logging equipments and army tanks. Changes in mix design, aggregate gradations and better equipment and placement techniques has made it possible for RCC to be used in parking lots, city streets and now for shoulders for high volume, high speed highways.
For more information about this story, contact Wouter Gulden at 678-546-1825. |
|
Return to Top
| |
Correction |
|
| ... |
In
|
... |
| |
In its recent Airports issue, CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROGRESS incorrectly stated the size and weight of Boeing's Dreamliner aircraft series.
The planes represent a trend of modern commercial jets that are heavier than their current counterparts, according to a company spokesperson.
The Dreamliner, rather than simply representing a growth in aircraft size, is the world ’s first mostly composite commercial airplane and is projected to use 20% less fuel per passenger than similarly sized airplanes. It also is said to produce fewer carbon emissions and have quieter takeoffs and landings, according to a Boeing press release.
CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROGRESS regrets the error. |
|
Return to Top
| | | |
| ACPA
Concrete Pavement Progress is published 12 times per year and covers current
practices and case histories in the concrete pavement industry. ACPA Concrete
Pavement Progress is distributed free of charge to public officials, ACPA
members, executive committee, board of directors, and affiliated chapter/state
paving associations.
All rights reserved.
Copyright 2007 by the American Concrete Pavement Association.
No portion of this publication may be reproduced mechanically
or electronically without the expressed written permission of
the American Concrete Pavement Association.
|
American Concrete Pavement Association
5420
Old Orchard Road, Suite A100
Skokie, IL 60077
Phone: 847-966-2272. Fax:
847-966-9970
(Washington) 500 New Jersey Ave., NW
7th Floor
Washington,
DC 20001
Phone: 202-638-ACPA (202-638-2272)
Fax:202-638-2688
(Mesa,
AZ) 807 W. Keating Ave.
Mesa, AZ 85210
Phone: 480-775-0908
|
|
2007 Chairman,
ACPA Board of Directors
Pat Nolan, Interstate
Highway Const., Inc. (IHC)
2007 Vice-Chairman, ACPA Board of Directors
Kari Saragusa, Lehigh Cement Co.
ACPA President/CEO - Gerald F. Voigt, P.E.
Editor
- Bill Davenport
Managing Editor
- Erin McKnight
Visit
our technical website at http://www.pavement.com
Visit our public website at www.pavements4life.com
|
|
|